Twit Wit?

Steve Halsey
September 7th, 2010

We have a new social media casualty for the “What were you thinking?” files.

You may recall the PR executive who foolishly tweeted about never wanting to live in his client’s hometown. Now we have Washington Post columnist Mike Wise who “experimented” with a knowingly false Twitter post.

In case you missed it, Wise posted a fake tweet about a reduced suspension for Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger for alleged misconduct.  In a big dose of irony, Wise ended up suspended as well. 

Even though he quickly acknowledged that the post was a hoax, his violation of the Post’s guidelines for social media and intentional deviation from the principles of good journalism resulted in Wise having a month off to think about it. 

Personally, I applaud the Post for a couple of things in this case. 

First, the publication has a social media policy in place (something many companies STILL do not have). Second, it believes in the policy enough to enforce it (you can decide for yourself if it was too harsh or lenient). 

A good social media policy should cover approved, encouraged and prohibited behavior, as well as rights and recourses thereof.  In fact, the Post’s social media policy regarding use of Twitter is about as straightforward as it gets. 

This recent example of carelessness isn’t likely to deter others from jumping aboard the “Twitter train,” as described by Mike Bazinet of Terex Corporation on a previous G&S webinar I moderated for manufacturing equipment communicators.

Adoption of social media among B2B marketers continues to grow, so it’s critical to have the rules of engagement established now.

Wise, himself, says he exercised poor judgment.  On his radio show that aired the day after the Twitter commotion,  he said, “The radio studio, my computer, everything is a big echo chamber.  It’s self contained and it’s reviewable for scrutiny.”  He went even further saying that, “I don’t want any debate over my actions and the punishment received…Just know that the most sacred thing in my business – the business of journalism, not radio schtick – is getting readers to believe that what you are telling them is the closest thing to the truth you can ascertain.  And I didn’t do that yesterday.”

I couldn’t agree more.

(Guest contributor Steve Halsey is a vice president and leads digital and social media planning at Gibbs & Soell Public Relations.)

Don’t Mix Your Message

Ron Loch
August 23rd, 2010

When I ride my bike, I wear a helmet.  Not out of habit – I never wore one as a child – and certainly not to make a fashion statement.  Let’s be honest, unless you’re in the Tour de France, helmets make adults look dorky.  I do it because I want my kids to wear theirs and I think I need to model the desired behavior. 

Apparently, I’m in the minority.  Riding around the neighborhood with my son last night, we kept meeting these families where the kids are wearing helmets, but not the parents.  I wonder how long it will take for the kids to decide they’re old enough to risk traumatic brain injury like Mom and Dad.

Mixed messages like this are a killer of progress, and I’m afraid I see similar incongruity in the actions of companies pursuing sustainability. 

I was handed a great example during a discussion with two executives of a company that sells sustainably produced coated papers.  We were discussing challenges they face when trying to convert customers to green solutions. 

Most were typical – misperceptions that green paper is more expensive and that purchasing agents are resistant to change.  One, however, stood out. 

They had a prospect that was committing itself to becoming more sustainable and green paper seemed to be the perfect way for them to convey this message.  The only problem? The company’s designers didn’t like how the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification watermark looked, so they wouldn’t source the green paper!

No wonder the recent G&S Sense & Sustainability Study™ found consumers and Fortune 1000 executives skeptical about the commitment of corporate America to sustainability.  Unless every department and supplier is making decisions that reflect dedication to sustainability, “going green” appears to be an option, not a business imperative. 

Everyone needs to model the desired behavior.  Even if it means risking helmet hair or the intrusion of a sustainable certification symbol on your brochure design.

Sustainability Soundtrack

Ron Loch
August 9th, 2010

I recently took my son fishing.  To make the seven-hour drive more tolerable for him, I switched on a pop music station – a station that only played about 10 songs in a continuous loop.  One, California Gurls by Katy Perry, got stuck in my brain.  It’s an earworm that plays subconsciously in a continuous loop. 

More than a week later I still find myself humming it.  Not because I like it, but just because it is there.

Fast forward to a peer-to-peer exchange among senior communicators and sustainability advocates I moderated last week in Manhattan. 

It was a great discussion with thought leaders from Verizon Communications and Church & Dwight sharing insights about how they are managing to instill a sustainability mindset within their companies. 

The spirited discussion among an intimate group over breakfast revolved around shared pain points in regards to building a sustainable enterprise

The one point that kept coming up was the need and difficulty in getting employees to embrace and implement sustainable practices. 

From resistance to double-sided printing to a laissez-faire attitude about computer monitors left on after hours, people around the table were struggling with the challenge of creating a sustainability mindset among employees. 

That got me thinking about my earworm.  How can we get sustainability to play as a subconscious soundtrack – ever present, requiring no more effort to conjure up than remaining awake? 

Certainly, we must explore more what sustainability can do for the employees personally than what they personally can do to save the earth.  Simple language is also a must – I think the only polysyllabic words in California Gurls are its namesake state and “bikini.”  But maybe most importantly is the idea of a continuous loop of a few selected hits. 

Sustainability can’t be just one of several company initiatives that employees are asked to embrace; something that is “launched” and left to take root organically. 

It needs to be the number one “song” played on a continuous loop so that it worms its way into the employee subconscious.

(Guest contributor Ron Loch is a senior vice president at Gibbs & Soell Public Relations. He leads the firm’s Greentech & Sustainability Practice, collaborating with G&S colleagues specializing in advanced manufacturing and energy, agribusiness and food, consumer lifestyle and building solutions, professional services, and technology and general science.)